Welcome, visitor! [ Register | Login

Comments Off on Why Change Of Bench Won’t Help Actor Dileep Get Bail?

Why Change Of Bench Won’t Help Actor Dileep Get Bail?

News September 13, 2017

Manu Sebastian

As the Kerala High Court re-opens after Onam holidays, the third bail application filed by Malayalam film actor Dileep in the crime pertaining to sexual assault of a co-actor will be closely watched by all. The earlier bail applications were considered and dismissed by Justice Sunil Thomas. An interesting development is that the roster of judges has been changed now and Justice Sunil Thomas is moved to another jurisdiction dealing with admission and hearing of cases relating to Abkari and NDPS Acts.

Now the question is whether the change in roster will improve the chances of getting bail for Dileep from another bench. Bail is not supposed to be on the hunch of the bench, as per the words of Justice Krishna Iyer. However, experienced lawyers will vouch for the fact that in bail applications, a lot depends on the temperament and the inclination of the judge, since there is a lot of room for judicial discretion. Taking advantage of that, there used to be practice of ‘forum-shopping’ in bail applications, whereby successive bail applications used to be filed to try luck before different judges.

Anyhow, there is no chance of hearing Dileep’s bail application by another Judge; particularly so after the pronouncement of the full bench of the Kerala High Court in Firos Ali vs State of Kerala.  Therein, the full bench issued guidelines for dealing with successive bail applications. It was categorically held that the subsequent bail application by the accused shall be heard by the same learned Judge who had passed orders in the earlier applications in the same crime.

The said safeguard has been taken to avoid the possibility to conflicting orders, and to minimise the chances for indulging in forum shopping. Also, this will save time of the court as a Judge familiar with the facts will be able to dispose of the subsequent application/applications effectively and as the same would be conducive to judicial discipline. The said guidelines are based on the decision of the Supreme Court in Jagmohan Dayal vs State(NCT of Delhi) 2014(14) SCALE 224. However, the Kerala High Court also clarified that the said direction will not be applicable to a bail application filed by a co-accused, and such bail application will be dealt with in the normal course as per the roster.

The first bail application of Dileep before the high court was dismissed by Justice Sunil Thomas on July 24, 2017. It was observed therein that “the case is unique,considering its seriousness, meticulous planning, cruel nature of execution and being a crime executed to wreak vengeance on a woman by engaging criminals to sexually abuse her. The Court must be circumspect in granting bail in such cases”.

The second bail application of Dileep before the high court was dismissed as per order dated August 29, 2017. Dismissing the application, Justice Sunil Thomas observed: “The investigation is still progressing. There  does not appear to be any substantial change of circumstance.  Having considered the entire facts, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage.”

So, the third application for bail moved by Dileep will be posted before Justice Sunil Thomas and none else. The change in roster is not going to have any effect on the bail application.


  • VHP leader gets bail in Gulberg society massacre case

    by on June 27, 2017 - 0 Comments

    VHP leader gets bail in Gulberg society massacre case In the first such relief in the 2002 Gulberg society massacre case, the Gujarat High Court today granted bail to a VHP leader, who was awarded seven years’ imprisonment. A division bench of justices Abhilasha Kumari and A J Shastri granted bail to Atul Vaidya, while […]

  • 17 SIMI men get 3 yrs jail for hurting religious feelings

    by on June 29, 2017 - 0 Comments

    17 SIMI men get 3 yrs jail for hurting religious feelings A Bhopal court today sentenced 17 activists of outlawed Students Islamic Movement of India to three years in jail for hurting religious feelings and committing other penal offences. Chief Judicial Magistrate Rakesh Sharma also imposed a fine of Rs 1,000 each on convicts Abu […]

  • Court dismisses bail pleas of 3 directors of real estate group

    by on June 26, 2017 - 0 Comments

    Three directors of real estate group Earth Infrastructure Ltd, accused in three cases of duping over 8,500 buyers by not giving possession of their properties, have been denied bail by a Delhi court. Additional Sessions Judge Chandra Shekhar dismissed the anticipatory bail applications of two directors — Vikas Gupta and Atul Gupta — and the […]

  • காவிரி: சுப்ரீம் கோர்ட்டில் மீண்டும் வழக்கு

    by on July 5, 2017 - 0 Comments

    புதுடில்லி:’காவிரி நடுவர் மன்ற உத்தரவின்படி, தமிழகத்துக்கு உரிய பங்கைத் தரும்படி, கர்நாடக அரசுக்கு உத்தரவிட வேண்டும்’ என, சுப்ரீம் கோர்ட்டில் தமிழக அரசு முறையிட்டு ள்ளது. முறையான மனுவை தாக்கல் செய்யும்படி சுப்ரீம் கோர்ட் கூறியுள்ளது.காவிரி நடுவர் மன்ற உத்தரவின்படி, ஜூன் மாதத்தில், 22.5 …

  • Cheque bounce cases need to be tackled with heavy hand: Court

    by on June 26, 2017 - 0 Comments

    Cheque bounce cases are unduly clogging the dockets of the courts and need to be tackled with a heavy hand, a Delhi court has said. The observation came as the court awarded one-year-jail term to a 42-year-old north Delhi resident Lalit Kumar, who had issued a cheque worth Rs one lakh to an army official’s […]

Case Status